Can a mortgagee take a deed from the mortgagor for the
mortgaged property and avoid paying the deeds excise tax by “assuming the
mortgage?”
This came up on the deed recorded in Book 30634, Page 120,
which was captioned “Deed in lieu of foreclosure.” A number of members of a
family (all mortgagors) conveyed the property at 75 Smith Street to the
mortgagee “in consideration of forgiveness of debt in the amount of $641,694.”
There was no additional consideration.
Based on the rule that the amount of the debt forgiven is
deemed monetary consideration and taxed accordingly, we assessed a tax due of
$2,927.52.”
The person recording the document objected to that, stating
that the mortgagee was in fact “assuming the mortgage.”
When property is conveyed and an existing mortgage is
assumed by the grantee, the amount of the indebtedness is not taxable.
I don’t believe that the mortgagee can “assume” a mortgage
that it holds. I think the interest conveyed with the mortgage merges with the
equity of redemption when the property is conveyed to the mortgagee which would
therefore extinguish the mortgage. (Whether it extinguished the debt is a
question of contract between the parties).
Based on this, I assessed the tax stamp and suggested to the
person recording it to seek an abatement from DOR. I’ve heard nothing more
about this situation, however, I have seen other cases where the mortgagee
takes a deed to the property and “assumes” the mortgage but I’m not sure
whether this is permissible.
No comments:
Post a Comment