Friday, April 17, 2020

Electronic Signatures by Municipal Boards


Massachusetts Deed Indexing Standards 2018
April 2020 Amendment
The Massachusetts Registers and Assistant Registers of Deeds Association has adopted the following Amendment to the Massachusetts Deed Indexing Standards 2018. This amendment is effective April 17, 2020.

13-7. Electronic Signatures by Municipal Boards – The following procedure is recommended for municipal boards and committees that wish to execute documents in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws chapter 110G (Uniform Electronic Transaction Act) which documents are then to be recorded at the registry of deeds.
1.       At a properly called meeting, the municipal board or commission should formally vote that the board recognizes and accepts the provisions of M.G.L. c.110G regarding electronic signatures and that its members will henceforth execute documents either with electronic signatures or with wet ink signatures and that both will carry the same legal weight and effect.

2.       The board then records at the registry of deeds a Certificate of Vote that provides the language of the motion that was made regarding electronic signatures and attests to the vote taken, and obtains the Town Clerk’s certification.

3.       Then, board members may cause their electronic signature to be affixed to permitting or compliance documents that have been approved by a board vote. Such electronically signed documents should also include a statement that the signatures are made in accordance with M.G.L. c.110G and pursuant to the board’s electronic signature authorization vote recorded on [DATE] in [BOOK and PAGE] at the [NAME OF REGISTRY] Registry of Deeds.

4.       Any document so executed shall be accepted for recording at the registry of deeds either in electronic form or as a paper print of the electronically executed document.

NOTE - The Massachusetts Land Court does not permit this procedure so electronic signatures may not be used on any REGISTERED LAND documents. Please see the Land Court website for further guidance.

No comments: